No. 22-6839
Michael O. Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender circuit-court-precedent conspiracy conspiracy-conviction criminal-career-offender prior-convictions sentence-enhancement sentencing-guidelines sixth-circuit state-convictions
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities
Environmental Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the court erred in failing to grant appellant relief from his sentence enhancement based upon his prior state convictions after Mathis and whether the court's ruling conflicts with the en banc decision in Davis and several other state circuit court of appeals decisions after Davis.
Whether the court erred when it failed to grant relief on appellant's claim that his conspiracy career offender conviction does not qualify for enhancement under U.S.S.G. §4B1.1.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in failing to grant appellant relief from his sentence enhancement based upon his prior state convictions
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael O. Brown
Michael Brown — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent