No. 22-6804
Joseph Mark Williams, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-procedure appellate-procedure civil-procedure criminal-statute due-process legal-timeline minor-protection motion-to-withdraw standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the 90 days under 28 U.S.C. § 1254 and Supreme Court
Rule 13 applies to an order granting a motion to withdraw an
appeal .
2. Whether the "use" element of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) is satisfied
when a clothed (or partially clothed) minor appears in an image
but is not actually "engaged" in any."sexually explicit" conduct.
3. If it. is not, is it professionally reasonable for counsel to
encourage and allow their client to plead guilty, instead of
arguing that, the content of the image did not constitute an
offense.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 90 days under 28 U.S.C. § 1254 and Supreme Court Rule 13 applies to an order granting a motion to withdraw an appeal
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Joseph Mark Williams
Joseph Mark Williams Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent