No. 22-679

NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc., et al. v. Marcia L. Fudge, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2023-01-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: agency-authority constitutional-avoidance due-process federalism fourth-amendment housing-regulation public-housing smoking-ban spending-clause
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether HUD lacks authority to adopt or enforce its smoking ban as a means to ensure "safe and habitable" public housing.

2. Whether the lower courts erred in granting HUD summary judgment on the smoking ban's compliance with the Spending Clause without any evidence that the Smoking Ban is not coercive.

3. Whether the lower courts erred by ignoring non-record evidence in constitutional adjudication.

4. Whether extra-pleading issues or evidence briefed and reached on summary judgment are "tried" by implied consent under FED. R. Civ. P. 15(b)(2).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether HUD lacks authority to adopt or enforce its smoking ban as a means to ensure 'safe and habitable' public housing

Docket Entries

2023-03-20
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent Fudge, Marcia, et al. to respond filed.
2023-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)

Attorneys

Fudge, Marcia, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc., et al.
Lawrence J. JosephLaw Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner