1). Whether, to establish a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83 (1963), a defendant must show that he could not have obtained the independent efforts ppressed, exculpatory evidence through his of "self-help " or "due diligence " as the 11th and other five circuits haveownsu held, or whether the defendant 's failure to uncover the evidence independently is irrelevant as the other six courts of appeal have held.

2). Whether, the failure of the prosecutor to correct the testimony of two law enforcement officers which he knew were false was a Giglio/Napue misconduct which denied Petitioner due process of the law in violation of the 5^ Amendment of the United States constitution.

Whether a defendant must show inability to obtain suppressed evidence through own efforts to establish Brady violation