1. The standard of review for error #1 - Dosen't the EEOC has Federal Investigators who do investigations when a complaint comes in their office and has the right to request any forms of documents relating to any investigation and make inquires relating to case loads and receive them out of good faith?

QUESTION: Why when the EEOC office investigator asked for documents, the Respondent withheld these documents, isn't it a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1505 during an investigation which lasted 2 years, and isn't withholding discovery material a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1509??

2. The standard of review for error #2 - This court has already ruled on cases relating to sexual harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, and age discrimination and has landmark cases and from them created rules and laws which has been implemented to prevent these acts in the future.

QUESTION: Did the District court and the Court of Appeal erred in denying the Petitioner her legal rights within her legal capacity from the facts in her case and prevented her from whistleblowing which was ruled on and based on the U.S. Constitution which prohibits this kind of behavior?

3. The standard of review for error #3 - lsn"t it the "Rights and Responsibility" of any person within the U.S. and its territories, under the 1st Ammendment for freedom of speech to make a complaint and be protected, and under the 14th Ammendment for due process when their rights were violated under the law of the U.S. Constitution?

Did the District court and the Court of Appeal erred in denying the Petitioner her legal rights within her legal capacity from the facts in her case and prevented her from whistleblowing which was ruled on and based on the U.S. Constitution which prohibits this kind of behavior?