In Re Lee Kent Hempfling, et ux.
1: Whether the listed state and federal court actions are parallel to any legally invoked criminal investigation of prosecution stemming from crimes reported inside and around the listed cases and whether those listed cases should be released from any hold placed on them for abandonment: a failure to prosecute.
2: Whether civil courts reporting crimes taking and the courts that maintain place against them jurisdiction over them should be ordered to publicly complete the process of the within cases given no common facts, no common parties and no common relationship to the crimes committed against the respective courts: plus the reasons set forth herein.
3: What constitutes censorship on the Internet?
4: What is protected speech regarding the Judicial Branch? If what a court says is not protected speech can be protected speech. A court ordering nothing of speech could be silenced if the court's freedom product is not protected speech.
Whether the listed state and federal court actions are parallel to any legally invoked criminal investigation or prosecution stemming from crimes reported inside and around the listed cases and whether those listed cases should be released from any hold placed on them for abandonment: a failure to prosecute