No. 22-6731
Lamon Demetrus Wright v. United States
Tags: confrontation confrontation-rights due-process evidence-admissibility federal-courts good-cause good-cause-standard hearsay hearsay-reliability reliability supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2023-06-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
What manner of hearsay should be considered "reliable" when federal courts decide whether the government has established "good cause" to deny confrontation in a supervised release revocation?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What manner of hearsay should be considered 'reliable' when federal courts decide whether the government has established 'good cause' to deny confrontation in a supervised release revocation?
Docket Entries
2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-08
Reply of petitioner Lamon Demetrus Wright filed.
2023-04-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 28, 2023.
2023-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2023 to April 28, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-27
Response Requested. (Due March 29, 2023)
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Lamon Wright
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent