The lower Courts have not explained their reasoning of written law, or statue why the Plaintiff was not allowed to submit evidence. I present this same question to this Court, the highest Court - What Law or Statue prohibits a Court at any level from accepting evidence if it was not submitted to the Court at the time the complaint was filed?

Based on this Rule - Why Did the Lower Courts not apply this Rule and allow the evidence?

When was the Plaintiff/Appellant supposedly to submit the evidence if Discovery had not taken place yet?

What is the Court's standing regarding the violation of a person's civil rights which is a violation of federal law and the Constitution?

Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing the case without allowing the plaintiff to present evidence, in violation of the plaintiff's constitutional rights