Does the Traditional Method of Determining Jurisdiction Under Territorial Principles apply to "Interstate Telephonic and Email —Computer Server Based Conspiratorial Vindictive Employment Reprisals " as Alleged in This Litigation, given the Supreme Court 's ruling in Strassheim v. Daily , 221 U.S. 280. 28111911)-1. that "a state may prosecute individuals for acts committed outside a jurisdiction when the effect of the acts is the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction "?

2. Did the Appellate Court and the District Court fail to consider the former employee 's [petitioner, Dr. Rafi] allegations of continuing vindictive employment retaliations around the nation from 2015 through 2021 "by his former employer and professional training institution [Yale University School of Medicine] " disregarding this Supreme Court 's binding ruling in Robinson V. Shell Oil Company , 519 U.S. 337 (1997)- that former employees may sue under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to challenge retaliation by their past employers ?

3. Did the Appellate Court and the District Court fail to consider the former employee 's [petitioner, Dr. Rafi] allegations of continuing vindictive employment retaliations around the nation from 2015 through 2021 "by his former employer and professional training institution [Yale University School of Medicine] " disregarding this Supreme Court 's binding ruling in Lawlor V. National Screen Service Corn., 349 U.S. 322 11955)- that "Res Judicata Does Not Bar a Suit, Even If It Involves the Same Course of Wrongful Conduct as Alleged Earlier, So Long as The Suit Alleges New Facts or A Worsening of the Earlier Conditions " ?

Does the Traditional Method of Determining Jurisdiction Under Territorial Principles apply to 'Interstate Telephonic and Email—Computer Server Based Conspiratorial Vindictive Employment Reprisals