No. 22-6721
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-charges criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ex-post-facto jury-determination jury-trial sixth-amendment supremacy-clause trial-procedure verdict-form
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the "verdict form " agreed upon by the jury failure to specify I.
"GUILTY " as to Count 1 violate 6th Amendment right to a jury
determination of Guilt?
Did trial court 's instruction to jury on uncharged alternative II.
theories violate right to trial by jury, right to be informed of
criminal charges and double jeopardy?
Did the Okaloosa State Attorney filing vague criminal charges III.
retrospectively interfere with constitutional right to legal
contracts contravene ex post facto clause and Supremacy
clause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the verdict form agreed upon by the jury failure to specify 'GUILTY' as to Count 1 violate 6th Amendment right to a jury determination of Guilt?
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2023)
2022-12-14
Application (22A526) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 28, 2023.
2022-11-18
Application (22A526) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 29, 2022 to February 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Jeffery T. Crystal
Jeffery T. Crystal — Petitioner