No. 22-6710
David Wekesa v. United States Attorney, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 8-usc-1226c civil-rights due-process immigration-detention judicial-review mandatory-detention procedural-protections reasonableness-of-detention statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether due process mandates procedural protections during lengthy periods of mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c).
2. How long does detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) need to be before an inquiry into the reasonableness of the detention can be conducted?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process mandates procedural protections during lengthy periods of mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c)
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-05-19
Brief of respondents United States Attorney, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-04-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 19, 2023.
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 19, 2023 to May 19, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-20
Response Requested. (Due April 19, 2023)
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent Federal respondents to respond filed.
2023-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2023)
Attorneys
David Wekesa
David Wekesa — Petitioner
Federal respondents
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent