No. 22-6707
Alfred E. Caraffa v. United States, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims damages due-process habeas-corpus immunity ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief procedural-default standing state-court-review
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims as unconstitutional acts done within the court's jurisdiction?
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Alfred Caraffa
Alfred Erik Caraffa — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent