No. 22-6681
Shane Swindall Chambers v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actus-reus constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence jury-instructions mens-rea modus-operandi other-acts-evidence trial-court
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS LIBERTY WITHOUT FIRST THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE A FALSE MODUS OPERANDI REQUIRED TO ADMIT OTHER ACTS EVIDENCE, AND WHERE THAT EVIDENCE WAS USED TO ESTABLISH ACTUS REUS - THE CRIME ITSELF.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner was deprived of due process
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden to respond filed.
2022-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Shane S. Chambers
Shane Swindall Chambers — Petitioner