No. 22-6673
Lenwood Mason v. Laurel Harry, Acting Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals certificate-of-appealability counsel-replacement court-of-appeals district-court due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED
IN DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
AFTER THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO MAKE
AN INQUIRY INTO A TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 3599(e)
REQUEST FOR COUNSEL REPLACEMENT
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in denying a certificate of appealability after the district court failed to make an inquiry into a Title 18 U.S.C. § 3599(e) request for counsel replacement
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent Laurel Harry, et al. to respond filed.
2022-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Laurel Harry, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Lenwood Mason
Lenwood Mason — Petitioner