No. 22-667

Chen Bing v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process executive-authority free-speech genocide-determination human-rights-violations international-law judicial-review standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-05-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) . were there genocide, crimes against humanity and forced labor in Xinjiang ? Is there sufficient evidence to support it? Does the Secretary of State have the authority to Determination it?

(2) . If the Secretary of State does not have this power , His Determination was illegal .Our research conclusion is correct that The so-called genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, china that are Century scam and international farce that is orchestrated and Propagation by several persons, Contemptofpeople quotient. This scam and farce have become the laws and foreign policy of the United States towards China. This very endangers democracy, republic, and the rule of law, very endangers the national interests and national security, causes major economic losses to the U.S., causes chaos in the international community, and the United Nations deceived, very damages the cause of human rights in the world and endangers international peace. Should the Courts fulfill their constitutional responsibilities to find out the basic facts of the case and eliminate the harm that is being done to the United States? Should this court uphold the Petitioner claim, judicial review of the Uyghur-related laws?

(3). U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and Maryland, Columbia Federal Court refused to try the case concerning the vital interests of the United States and major factual and legal issues in the United States and international community. The case is an important federal question, an issue that cannot be resolved by federal law, and the judgment "departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings " and violated the Petitioner 's constitutional right and Statutory Right to Review, Should be this court supervise and correct it?

(4). Those responsible for Conspiracy to commit an offense or to defraud the United States and lying to Government Agents in this case 's defendants should be investigated, held criminally liable, and support the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law?

(5). For the public interest, Why can 't Pacific Research and Education Institute(PREI) participate in the lawsuit without hiring a lawyer?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether there is sufficient evidence of genocide, crimes against humanity and forced labor in Xinjiang, China, and whether the Secretary of State has the authority to make such a determination?

Docket Entries

2023-05-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-04-12
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Government Agencies to respond filed.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Chen Bing
Chen Bing — Petitioner
Federal Government Agencies
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent