No. 22-6659
Armando Lopez-Rivera v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review appellate-standard concurrent-sentence gall-precedent gall-v-united-states individualized-assessment intellectual-disability judicial-explanation sentencing-courts sentencing-explanation sentencing-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-03-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a sentencing court must provide a reasonable explanation, on the record, as to why it is not considering a sentencing factor advanced by a defendant during sentencing to comply with High Court precedents.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentencing court must provide a reasonable explanation, on the record, as to why it is not considering a sentencing factor advanced by a defendant during sentencing to comply with High Court precedents
Docket Entries
2023-03-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2023)
Attorneys
Armando Lopez-Rivera
Raul Santiago Mariani — Mariani Franco Law, PSC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent