No. 22-6658
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal circuit-court-ruling conviction criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion leadership-role retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the District Court err by refusing to apply the Seventh Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. Carnell retroactively since Petitioner's conviction was not finalized?
Did the District Court err by including two point Leadership role where Petitioner never exercised any control or authority over anybody in the conspiracy and the record does not support this enhancement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court err by refusing to apply the Seventh Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. Carnell retroactively since Petitioner's conviction was not finalized?
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wade Bonk
Wade Bonk — Petitioner