No. 22-6651
Michael Vanous v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure guidelines ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion jury pretrial-proceedings sentencing sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question 1: Was defense counsel ineffective in the pretrial proceedings?
Question 2: Was it a violation of the Sixth Amendment to sentence outside the guidelines without a jury present?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was defense counsel ineffective in the pretrial proceedings?
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael Vanous
Michael Vanous — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent