No. 22-6624
Daniel Ray Loyd v. Neil McDowell, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process felony-murder felony-murder-rule ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions prejudice right-to-counsel state-law-error
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel was ineffective by conceding Mr. Loyd's guilt of all charges, including robbery in a felony murder case
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent Neil McDowell to respond filed.
2023-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Daniel Loyd
Daniel Ray Loyd — Petitioner
Neil McDowell
Jill M. Thayer — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent