No. 22-6608

Arthur Torlucci v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-01-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process imprisonment indigent-defendants misdemeanor right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2023-03-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

IS THE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS, IN DENYING AUTOMATIC REVIEW OF CONVICTION PURSUANT TO U.S. GRIFFIN V. ILLINOIS, 351 U.S. 12 (1956) FOR INDIGENT SENTENCES TRANSCRIPTS RECORD BEING ON OR NEVER TRANSCRIBED AND FAR & PAPER NOT CONVICTION APPEAL CAN BE DONE WITHOUT SENTENCES TRANSCRIPTS CULPABLE FED. CO. 4 ILL. POST CONVICTION HARW AT, 11. REV. STAT. CH. 3 5 826-832.) ESPECIALLY WHEN THE PRISONER IS ACTUALLY FREE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE NOT BEING ALLOWED TO APPEALS

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the government to provide counsel to indigent defendants in misdemeanor cases where imprisonment is a possible punishment

Docket Entries

2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2022-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)

Attorneys

Arthur Torlucci
Arthur Torlucci — Petitioner