No. 22-6595
Solita Harrington v. MedStar Washington Hospital Center, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process free-speech habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance medical-malpractice ninth-circuit standing state-court
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is Medstar Washington Center Hospital and their attorney going to say that petitioner is not about having ovarian cancer and the respondent mis-diagnosing petitioner and performing Surgery.
Dr. Konrad Dawson and their attorney from Temple Law Firm did not call the office to speak to Dr. Dawson at least Question concerning Venish that Dr. Dawson referred petitioner to Temple law firm for Medical Malpractice representation.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the respondents' actions violated the petitioner's constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent Washington Area Plastic Surgery/ Consultation Konrad Dawson, M.D. to respond filed.
2023-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent MedStar Washington Hospital Center to respond filed.
2022-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)
Attorneys
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Benjamin S. Harvey — Jackson & Campbell, P.C., Respondent
Solita Harrington
Solita Harrington — Petitioner
Washington Area Plastic Surgery/ Consultation Konrad Dawson, M.D.
G. Branch Taylor — Taylor & Uhl, LLC, Respondent