No. 22-6592
James Stacey Harber v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining section-2255 sentencing
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was Mr. Harber denied the effective assistance of counsel at the plea and sentencing phase of trial?
2. Did the district court err by denying Mr. Harber's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition?
3. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err by denying Mr. Harber's right to certificate of appealability?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Mr. Harber denied the effective-assistance-of-counsel,due-process,criminal-procedure,habeas-corpus,certificate-of-appealability,sentencing
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)
2022-07-01
Application (22A1) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 3, 2022.
2022-06-25
Application (22A1) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 5, 2022 to September 3, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
James Stacey Harber
James Stacey Harber — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent