1. Was Public Defender Robert Brodsky ineffective by assisting defendant to enter a plea without using improperly calculated Sentencing Guidelines policy statements?

2. Was Public Defender Robert Brodsky ineffective by not allowing defendant to present a presentence report?

3. Was Public Defender Robert Brodsky ineffective by not objecting to information about pending charges to be used in a bond hearing?

4. Was Public Defender Robert Brodsky ineffective by filing to certify a prepauper for sentencing violation pursuant to class 7 tort?

5. Was Public Defender Robert Brodsky ineffective by not bringing to Court's attention that at initial hearing defendant was not given an opportunity to speak?

6. Was Public Defender Robert Brodsky ineffective by not adopting defendant's Writ of Habeas Corpus?

7. Was Appellant Dwyer Brian ineffective in his prejudice by filing Anders Brief?

8. Was Appellant Dwyer Brian ineffective by failing to address the Court of Appeals order to address the individual issue that would benefit from adverse trial precedent on the Appeals Court identified?

9. Was Appellant Dwyer Brian ineffective by not arguing the District Court's multiple references to defendant's lack of respect for the law?

10. Was Appellant Dwyer Brian ineffective by defending that he would have to proceed PRO SE with his U.S. Supreme Court Certiorari?

Whether the Court of Appeals failed to properly consider or address the Court's abuse of discretion