No. 22-6540
Brandon Williams v. United States
Tags: actual-case-requirement categorical-approach circuit-split criminal-law criminal-sentencing gonzales-v-duenas-alvarez precedent sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation taylor-v-united-states
Key Terms:
Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
When the underlying state statute is plainly broader than the generic definition of a criminal sentencing enhancement provision, must the defendant also meet the actual case requirement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When the underlying state statute is plainly broader than the generic definition of a criminal sentencing enhancement provision, must the defendant also meet the actual case requirement?
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-16
Reply of petitioner Brandon Williams filed.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-04-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 14, 2023.
2023-03-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 15, 2023.
2023-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 13, 2023 to March 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Brandon Williams
Jessica Alice Graf — Jessica Graf Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent