1. When states open their postconviction forums to federal claims raised in a successor posture based on newly-discovered evidence, do they have to administer those forums evenhandedly, or may they discriminate against newly-discovered federal claims brought by death-sentenced prisoners because of their status?

2. Does the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' refusal to consider the merits of Mr. Wood's concededly meritorious, newly-discovered federal Constitutional claim discriminate against his federal rights?

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to afford state prisoners some adequate corrective process for the hearing and determination of claims of violation of federal constitutional guarantees