No. 22-6526
Anton Michael Kubica v. California
IFP
Tags: case-dismissal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-review material-evidence prosecutorial-delay prosecutorial-misconduct speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS THE APPELLANT DENIED HIS FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS, BECAUSE OF UNJUSTIFIED, PREJUDICIAL PROSECUTORIAL DELAY IN FILING THE PETITION WHICH THEN RESULTED IN THE LOSS OF MATERIAL EVIDENCE NECESSARY TO DEFEND HIS CASE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the appellant denied his federal and state constitutional right to due process, because of unjustified, prejudicial prosecutorial delay in filing the petition which then resulted in the loss of material evidence necessary to defend his case?
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2022-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Anton Kubica
Anton Michael Kubica — Petitioner