No. 22-6513
Jeremy Dale Bartram v. West Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-rule fair-trial presumption-of-innocence prosecutorial-discretion rule-404(b) uncharged-misconduct
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the prosecution's use of 'uncharged misconduct' under Rule 404(b) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence strip a criminal defendant of the presumption of innocence whereby denying him or her the right to a fair trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the prosecution's use of 'uncharged misconduct' under Rule 404(b) strip a criminal defendant of the presumption of innocence?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent West Virginia to respond filed.
2022-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeremy Dale Bartram
Jeremy Dale Bartram — Petitioner
West Virginia
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent