Whether the Butler County Area III Court, West Chester Ohio, clearly and indisputably abused its' discretion when it ordered a forcible entry and detainer action against petitioner, on March 4,2020? (The Landings at Beckett Ridge vs Rosalind Holmes, No: CVG 1901594, Butler County Area III Court, West Chester, Ohio), (Exhibit A, Attached)

2. Whether the Butler County Area III Court, West Chester Ohio, clearly and indisputably abused its1 discretion and denied appellant due process of law and equal protection by denying appellants motion for Rule 60(b)(4)(5) relief from judgment, on August 23, 2021, and September 27,2021? (The Landings at Beckett Ridge vs Rosalind Holmes, No: CVG 1901594, Butler County Area III Court), (Appendix1. C)

3. Whether Ohio's Twelfth Appellate Court of Appeals clearly and indisputably abused its' discretion and denied appellant due process of law and equal protection by denying appellants motion for Rule 60(b)(4)(5) relief from judgment? (The Landings at Beckett Ridge vs Rosalind Holmes, No: 2021-09-118, Ohio's Twelfth District Court of Appeals), (Appendix D)

4. Whether the Butler County Area III Court, located in West Chester, Ohio lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, violated Ohio Revised Code §§ 1907.03 and 1907.031, the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure 12(H)(3) and 13(J) when they granted Lakefront at West Chester, LLC. forcible entry and detainer action against, Petitioner, Rosalind Holmes, on August 19, 2021? (Lakefront v Holmes, No: CVG 2100651, Butler County Area III Court, Appendix P)

5. Whether the Butler County Area III Court deprived petitioner of her legal rights under Title VIII, FHA Housing Discrimination, Ohio Revised Code § 4112, etc. and violated Petitioners ' rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution when they granted Lakefront at West Chester, LLC. forcible entry and detainer action against, Petitioner, Rosalind Holmes, on August 19, 2021? (Lakefront v Holmes, No: CVG 2100651, Butler County Area III Court, Appendix P)

6. Whether the Butler County Area III Court, West Chester Ohio, clearly and indisputably abused its' discretion, violated the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure 12(H)(3) and 13(J) and O.R.C §§ 1907.03 and 1907.031, and failed to follow binding precedent including but not limited to the Ohio Supreme Court 1 case of Pratts v. Hurley, 102 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2004) and the United States Supreme Court

Whether the Butler County Area III Court, West Chester Ohio, clearly and indisputably abused its' discretion when it ordered a forcible entry and detainer action against petitioner, on March 4, 2020?