Anthony Rohlf v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
1. ) Does the definition of the term "Claim", given by this court in Gonzales V. Crosby, p 545 U.S. 524, 530-32(2005) , still stand as the law of the land?; If so:
2. ) Did the^ruling made in the Sfchscircuit -in Rohlf V. Lumpkin, No.22-10038;. (5th Cir[Tex.] Aug. 11 2022) use;-a :diferent definition of "Claim", making a ruling squarely in confli ct with relevant decisions of this court, and other circuit courts as well?
3. )CoiM.t:h.e 5th circuit's ruling, that my 60(b)(3) motion was a successive writ, effect other citizens similarly situated, I.E., Pro-Se Prisoner petitioners with no other adequet remedies at law?
Does the definition of the term 'Claim' given by this court in Gonzales v. Crosby still stand as the law of the land?