No. 22-6478

Hanan Shiheiber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-01-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: chase chase-bank covid-19 estoppel fdic fdic-dissolution federal-law mortgage-foreclosure mortgage-foreclosure-crisis washington-mutual
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

The fraud of various banks that occurred during the mortgage
foreclosure crisis was exacerbated during the COVID-19 epidemic. This case
presents the Court with the opportunity to lay out the rules of law that
should be followed by courts in these cases and to resolve many of the
outstanding issues, in which there is substantial conflict:

1. Washington Mutual, FSB, was dissolved by the FDIC and the FDIC
agreed to sell to Chase many of Washington Mutual 's loans, but some courts
have concluded that Chase purchased all of the loans, even though, as in this
case, the IRS concluded that Petitioner 's mortgage was not included. Thus,
the question is whether the ownership of a former Washington Mutual
mortgage is a question of fact.

2. Whether Chase committed numerous violations of federal and state
law such that it should be estopped from foreclosing on Petitioner 's property.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the ownership of a former Washington Mutual mortgage is a question of fact

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-18
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2022-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Hanan Shiheiber
Hanan Shiheiber — Petitioner
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Mia S. BlacklerLubin Olson & Niewiadomski, LLP, Respondent