Whether the Ninth Circuit violates Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights when it decides in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 that the district court has not abused discretion vacates all four motion-to-dismiss hearings, deprives Pro Se Petitioner from argue points/submit evidence/testify issues, and dismisses the case without leave to amend and with prejudice, in conflict with many decisions of this Court, circuit courts including Ninth Circuit, and state supreme courts.

Whether the District Court abuses discretion dismisses all civil rights actions, in Second Amended Complaint (SAC) under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, without leave to amend and with prejudice based on Rule 12(b) (6), in conflict with decisions of this Court, Ninth Circuit and California Supreme Court in violation of Petitioner's due process rights of Fourteenth Amendment and of Fourth Amendment.

Whether the District Court abuses discretion dismisses all viable state law causes of action, in First Amended Complaint (FAC), without leave to amend and with prejudice based on Cal. Gov. Immunity Code Sec. 821.6, which is waived by the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Cal. Tort Claims Act 911.2, and Cal Gov. Code Sections 822.2, 815.2(a), 815.3(a) (b)(c), 820.4, and 820.8.

Whether the Ninth Circuit violates Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights