No. 22-6447
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arbitrariness civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-discretion jury-trial state-constitution state-rules-of-civil-procedure trial-by-jury
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WHETHER THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS 7TH AMEND., FED. R. CIVIL P. RULE 38, TENN. CONST. ART. 1 § 6 AND TENN. R. CIVIL P. 38.01
2. WHETHER THE TENN. SUP. CT. TENN. CT. APP., AND THE CIRCUIT COURT ARBITRARILY DEPRIVED THE PETITIONER OF HIS GUARANTEED CONSTITUTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN THIS CIVIL ACTION
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the provisions set forth in the Bill of Rights, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Tennessee Constitution, and the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Roger A. Page, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-27
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2023)
Attorneys
In Re David A. Avery
David A. Avery — Petitioner
Roger A. Page, et al.
Joseph F. Whalen III — Attorney general's Office, Respondent