#1. Whether Hardin v. Straub , 490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998),
104 L.Ed 2d 582, 57 USLW 4554 is relevant pursuant to United
States Supreme Court, Justice Stevens and the (1989) majoritys
holdings?

#2. Whether the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals was
obligated to take into consideration and follow this United
States Supreme Courts (1998) majoritys holdings pursuant to:
Hardin v. Straub , 490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998)??

#3. Whether the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Washington, State (Spokane), was obligated to take into
consideration and follow this United States Supreme Courts (1998),
majoritys holdings pursuant to: Hardin v. Straub , 490 U.S. 536,
109 S.Ct. (1998)???

#4. Whether both the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Washington, State and the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals caused a circuit split that is contrary to this United
States Supreme Courts (1998) majoritys holdings and sheperdized
case[s] pursuant to Justice Stevens holdings in: Hardin v. Straub ,
490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998), when they deprived Petitioner of
federal constitutional rights and dismissed the attempted murder
unjuries complaint with prejudice as being "time-barred ", in clear
violation and disrespect of cited and argued: Hardin v. Straub ,
490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998)?

Whether Hardin v. Straub is relevant to the Supreme Court's holdings