No. 22-6435

Willie Tyrone Shipley v. D. Holbrook

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights confrontation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence fourteenth-amendment prosecutorial-discretion sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Latest Conference: 2023-01-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

1.)
Is a defendant deprived of his right to
Confrontation and
due Process within
the meaning of the Sixth, and Fourteenth
Amendments Whea the District Attorney failed
to take all reasonable
Steps to Secure
complaining
Witness?

2)IS a d
defendant deprived of his right to due
process
within the meaning of the fourteeth
Amendment When hearsay evidence of a
Sexval assault allegation from 10-years prior
was presented and absent the witness Pursuant
to Evidence code Section 1lo8?

When defense counsel declared a conflict
of intrest
Pursuant to the united states
Constitution, Under-Rule -3-3lo and Sixth
Amendment,

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant was deprived of his right to confrontation and due process under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments when the district attorney failed to take reasonable steps to secure the testimony of a reluctant witness

Docket Entries

2023-01-23
Petition DENIED
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2023-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent D. Holbrook to respond filed.
2022-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2023)

Attorneys

D. Holbrook
Herbert S. TetefAttorney Gene. of California, Respondent
Willie Tyrone Shipley
Willie Tyrone Shipley — Petitioner