No. 22-6431
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights eighth-amendment guilty-plea juvenile-justice juvenile-sentencing miller-factors miller-v-alabama plea-bargaining proportionate-penalties sentencing sentencing-discretion
Latest Conference:
2023-05-25
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether a pre-Miller guilty plea bars a post-Miller sentencing challenge under the Eighth Amendment.
(2) Whether the sentencing process mandated by Miller and Jones is satisfied where the judge accepts a negotiated plea agreement but fails to consider the attendant circumstances of youth.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a pre-Miller guilty plea bars a post-Miller sentencing challenge under the Eighth Amendment
Docket Entries
2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-09
Reply of petitioner Philip Johnson filed. (Distributed)
2023-04-24
Brief of respondent Illinois in opposition filed.
2023-03-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 24, 2023.
2023-03-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 20, 2023 to April 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 20, 2023.
2023-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2023 to March 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-17
Response Requested. (Due February 16, 2023)
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-05
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Illinois
Philip Johnson