No. 22-6417
Eric C. Burgie v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure claim-construction criminal-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus judicial-interpretation racial-discrimination standing statute-of-limitations tolling
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Surgte bo cfe£ CQ mode 0/0^QOTLt&zhe ^wve //ujruiW suclnC.C ncujr'n S kmc ?
3. wUe-Hoer- 4^e AisfricV ccu^rV oWsei) Ai'scn^en
iVuiV^r>
Hr. o^pomVtwev^- oi course}, uxyW fWW
Wioir
^ sWk'ofcfie tocfloAfeO C\d^ CCpb So '^noi' |^e cojeU) pr^ies^nV «xi\tlW\r>C ie'
%-^rc ot kc\6AsaS«u si's
^j5$,cx\vyviV O^OO agavsnst" moS 'Vtj lauj" ifmcowie ^>W& JLe
^'A^lay^ coWsJ vci^e Cc^lWi (MuJrdW- ©indlA ^\rav'ca\e^
sVe\r\V" c^e.\rt&^ cdt" "Hoe robWry vjJm^cla teSCiS <L (non
V^w\e 4W cn wie *?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Mr. Burgie's Rule 60(b) motion and appointment of counsel
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Dexter Payne to respond filed.
2022-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Dexter Payne
Eric C. Burgie
Eric C. Burgie — Petitioner