No. 22-6414
Keith Antonio Barnett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process hearsay hearsay-testimony jury-instruction theory-of-defense
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE WAS VIOLATED WHEN
PROSECUTORS RELIED, EXCLUSIVELY, ON HEARSAY TESTIMONY TO
CONVICT THE PETITIONER?
WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS
WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT REFUSED TO ISSUE A JURY INSTRUC
TION COVERING HIS THEORY OF DEFENSE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause was violated when prosecutors relied, exclusively, on hearsay testimony to convict the petitioner?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Keith Barnett
Keith Antonio Barnett — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent