No. 22-6392

Adam Tello v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect legal-correction sentencing sentencing-error standing strickland-standard
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a jurisdictional defective sentence is "non-law" and cannot be adjudicated time or procedurally barred under U.S. Supreme Court law of United States v. Griffin, 82 L.Ed 764 (1938)?

Whether a jurisdictional defective sentence must be noticed, heard, and adjudicated at any time or procedurally barred adjudication?

Whether an unlawful (jurisdictional defective) sentence, "no" appeal to a court of appeals time or procedurally barred adjudication, by Supreme Court?

Whether a jurisdictional defective sentence is "non-law" and cannot be time or procedurally adjudication under S.CT law of United States v. Griffin, 82 L.Ed 764 (1938)?

Whether counsel was grossly 100% ineffective, jurisdictionally defective sentence was given to the criminal client, by given the trial judge, the police and probation department finding drug amounts for sentence under title 21:841, outside the trial jury verdict sheet when Strickland S.CT caselaw states that if counsel caused a greater sentence to be given?

Whether the above (8) Supreme Court caselaw states that only the police, nor probation department can find the weight for sentence under title 21:841 drug penalty chart, house the trial jury verdict sheet, thus only the trial jury can find legally the weight sentencing and no one else?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a jurisdictional defective sentence must be noticed, heard, adjudicated and legally corrected at any time, whether on appeal or any other motion

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-24
Application (22A173) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 29, 2022.
2022-08-23
Application (22A173) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 30, 2022 to October 29, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
2022-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)

Attorneys

Adam Tello
Adam Tello — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent