Does state prisoner "fairly present " federal nature of his claim on direct appeal where he cites to a lone Florida Supreme Court case that cites to, and was decided on, federal grounds?

Where state and federal claims share the same legal standard, has a federal claim been "fairly presented " when the state court necessarily rejects the federal claim in ruling on the state claim?

Does sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim, where state and federal law share identity, "fairly present " the federal nature of a state-law claim when state court must naturally use the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) in order to adjudicate the claim?

Does state prisoner fairly present federal nature of his claim on direct appeal