No. 22-638
Mary La Riccia, et vir v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: ada americans-with-disabilities-act disability disability-rights doctor-patient-relationship employment medical-care medical-communication title-i title-iii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can the restrictions placed on employees under Title I of the ADA be applied to an individual seeking medical care and treatment under Title III?
2. Are the tone, nature and content of a mentally disabled individuals' digital communications with their physician regarding their disability produced and/or affected by their disability?
3. Does Ohio law permit an individual's doctor-patient relationship to be terminated by third parties?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the restrictions placed on employees under Title I of the ADA be applied to an individual seeking medical care and treatment under Title III?
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Application (22A889) denied by the Court.
2023-05-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-02
Application (22A889) referred to the Court.
2023-04-26
Rescheduled.
2023-04-19
Application (22A889) refiled and submitted to Justice Alito.
2023-04-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-11
Application (22A889) denied by Justice Kavanaugh.
2023-04-07
Application (22A889) Writ of Injunction, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2023-03-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-03-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al.
Timothy S. Anderson — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Mary La Riccia, et vir
Mary La Riccia — Petitioner