No. 22-6376
Marcus Joseph v. South Carolina
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: arbitrary-suspension civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ex-post-facto habeas-corpus proportionality-review sentencing-guidelines state-court
Latest Conference:
2023-06-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Respondent's arbitrary suspension of the writ of habeas corpus is constitutional
Docket Entries
2023-06-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-03-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina to respond filed.
2022-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Marcus Joseph
Marcus Joseph — Petitioner
South Carolina
Mark Reynolds Farthing — S.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent