WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIOLATED PRECEDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCED IN MILLER-EL V. COCKRELL 537 U.S. 322, 336-37 (2003), COPPEDGE V. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 438, 435 (1962) AND CONTRARY TO 28 U.S.C. § 2253(C)(2) WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FROM THE DISTRICT COURT'S DENIAL OF PETITIONER'S ACTUAL INNOCENCE HABEAS CORPUS CLAIM

whether-the-court-of-appeals-for-the-ninth-circuit-rendered-a-decision-in-conflict-with-controlling-precedent-of-the-united-states-supreme-court