I. Whether Earls should have to serve the same Federal Sentence a Second Time. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit violated Earls Constitutional Rights by deciding that Earls Federal Sentence still has to be served. Altho the Federal Sentence was issued First prior to any State Sentence and his State Sentence was issued consecutive to the Federal Sentence. Earls Federal Sentence has been satisfied in full.as given

II. Whether the Court of Appeals and District Court both failed to apply section USSG 5G1.3 sentencing guideline to Earls Sentence because line does apply and would run Earls Federal Sentence and Sentences together.the guide the State

Whether Earls should have to serve the same Federal Sentence a Second Time