• Tie lower federal and state courts unreasonably applied tiis Court's ioldings finding tiat Hart was sot da?ted affective assistance of counsel regarding a? Involuntary confession claia committed by detectives witi a doc5seated history of incoBStltitiofial practices i> obtaining false confessions (and newly presented evidence demonstrating same) 1 jstifyi 'ng certiorari by tiis Cojrt*1
(pgs. 9-13)

2. Did tie lower co;rts (federal and state) inreasonably apply tits-Court's loldiags- in finding tiat Hart was sot denied iis substantive Slxti (5ti) and Fojrteeatl (14ti) U.S.C.&. rigits to retained counsel of cidles pjrs;ant to tiis Court's lolding implicating, inter alia, United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez # 125 S. Ct. 2557 (2005) a?d ineffective assistance of cojssel 1ader tie material facts of tie claim demonstrating a strictjral error in tie state co^rfe. trial proceedings -justifying certiorari?
(pgs. 13-21 >

3• Wietier tils Co;rt sio;ld grant certiorari to enter a clear lolding in a labeas corpus case to decide wietier a petitioner is legally entitled to iava tie federal courts mandate' tie state to prodjca all tiat transpired In tie state co;rt proceedings for purposes of federal review consistent witi R;les Governing 2254 cases, Rile 5(c), wiere a labeas petitioner las raised substantive claims of ineffective, assistance of counsel in failing to review relevant transcriptions of trial proceedings<!
(pgs. 22-34)

4. Wietier tie lower court 's lava so far departed from tie accepted a ad' ns;al cojrse of 1;dlcial proceedings as to call for a? , exercise of til's Court 's supervisory power and/or lava decided an important federal question In a way tiat conflicts witi relevant decisions of tils Cojrfe regarding Hart's denial of iis Slxti \mendmegt rig it to a Speedy -Trla l
(pgs. 34-40)

Whether the lower federal and state courts unreasonably applied this Court's holdings finding that Yart was not denied effective assistance of counsel regarding an involuntary confessions claim committed by detectives with a documented history of unconstitutional practices in obtaining false confessions (and newly presented evidence demonstrating same)