No. 22-6356
Tyler Nees v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause cross-examination due-process evidence federal-review habeas-corpus hearsay independent-state-ground procedural-default sixth-amendment state-court
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits the admission of testimonial hearsay evidence without an opportunity for cross-examination
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)
Attorneys
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Tyler Nees
Tyler Nees — Petitioner