No. 22-6355
Jess Richard Smith v. Sgt. Ellis, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process federal-courts federal-procedure free-speech habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief standing
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) whether the Ninth Circwit's 10-7.22,
ORDER,granting Respondent's
motion To Revoke In Forma
Pauperi's under 28 U.S.C.8
1915(g),Three strikes provisions,
creates a conflict with
established Federal court of
Appeals case las regarding
post filing"
((
strikes
2) Whether the Ninth Circuit's
order, granting Respondents
motion
TO
Rebkeuias
entered in error because
the order, does not state
strike the count
what
counted, in revoking IFP?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Khe Uuth Circo tks (0-722, ORDER Granting CVeseevdeniis _ Metion TO Reveke TH Comme
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-05
Waiver of right of respondents Sgt. Ellis, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)
Attorneys
Jess Richard Smith
Jess R. Smith — Petitioner
Sgt. Ellis, et al.
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent