Could reasonable jurists debate whether a state court's dispositive credibility determination regarding federal constitutional rights, based on a written statement being credited over the petitioner's live testimony regarding controverted facts, with no good cause for relying on an out-of-court writing, constituted an unreasonable application of this Court's authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) and an unreasonable determination of the facts under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2).

Could reasonable jurists debate whether a state court's dispositive credibility determination regarding federal constitutional rights, based on a written statement being credited over the petitioner's live testimony regarding controverted facts, with no good cause for relying on an out-of-court writing, constituted an unreasonable application of this Court's authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) and an unreasonable determination of the facts under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)