IS IT NOT ERRONEUOSLY FACTUAL AND A MISAPPLICATION OF LAW, RULE
OR STATUE FOR THE STATE COURTS AND DISTRICT COURTS TO CONCUR WITH A
CONTINUANCE THAT WAS NOT MADE APART OF THE STATE COURT RECORD?? IS
IT STATUTORILY SOUND? IS THIS NOT A DIRECT RESULT OF INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL NOT TO HAVE RAISED THIS CLAIM ON APPEAL
PURSUANT TO THE 6 AND 14 AMENDMENT? DOES NOT THE SPEEDT TRIAL CLOCK
RESUME IN ITS RUNNING AFTER A NEW EVENT OR COURT DATE IS
ESTABLISHED?

IS IT SUFFICIENTLY SOUND TO CONCUR WITH AN INACCURATE FACTUAL
FINDING OF GUILT THAT WAS NOT ACHIEVED PERTAINING TO EACH AND EVERY
ELEMENT OF THEE OFFENSE CHARGED BY LAW? IS A CITIZEN NOT ACTUALLY
INNOCENT, IF FOUND NOT GULITY? DOES NOT INSUFFICENCY OF EVIDENCE
LEAD TO ACTUAL INNOCENCE? UNDER THIS CLAIM AM I NOT ENTITLED TO
EQUAL PROTECTION PURSUANT TO THE 14 AMENDMENT?

Is it not erroneously factual and a misapplication of law, rule or statute for the state courts and district courts to concur with a continuance that was not made a part of the state court record?