No. 22-6342
Palani Karupaiyan v. L. Naganda, et al.
Tags: all-writs-act civil-rights due-process extraordinary-writ judicial-relief jurisdiction legal-standard mandamus parallel-proceedings prohibition standing
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Petitioner's reliefs were prayed as Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition or alternative so the questions were part of three test condition of the Writs.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's requested relief of a writ of mandamus or prohibition was properly denied
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2023-03-15
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-02-21
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Palani Karupaiyan
Palani Karupaiyan — Petitioner