No. 22-6332

In Re James Vandivere

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-12-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: adam-walsh-act civil-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus necessary-and-proper-clause pro-se-petition
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is Petitioner entitled to immediate Requested Relief when the originating
party offers no claim(s) of De facto injury, presents no "Case " or
"Controversies(s) ", federal question or jurisdictional statement in his
"Opening Brief that would give him standing to invoke the Art. Ill jurisdiction
of the District Court? " [See: Exhibit "C"] [D.E.-l]

2. Is Petitioner entitled to immediate Requested Relief from this court when
Petitioner was civilly committed by an Art. Ill District Court that was in want
of any jurisdiction when opening party was without standing to invoke the
jurisdiction of the Court? [ Please see attached declaration]

3. Did this courts position change towards not endorsing "the doctrine of
hypothetical jurisdiction " by a federal district court? When that court was in
want of proper jurisdiction of the matter before it, this court should grant the
petition and cause the immediate unconditional release of the petitioner, [see
exhibit B]

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-01
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

James Vandivere
James Dow Vandivere — Petitioner